Legal Opinion
Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 20, 1997No. 96CA0788PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs, Brian Raitz and Tristan Naranjo, concluding that State Farm was required to pay personal injury protection (PIP) benefits on behalf of Naranjo. We reverse and remand with instructions that summary judgment be entered in favor of State Farm.
The following facts are not disputed. Nar-anjo was injured when he fell off the roof of a van being driven by Raitz. The van was insured by State Farm, and was owned by James E. and Margaret Dahlin (the Dahlins) who were also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blue Cross of Western New York v. BukulmezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Bukulmez v. Hertz Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Wiglesworth v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- McConnell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Winscom v. GarzaColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998