Legal Opinion
Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 8, 1998No. 97SC446PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
We granted certiorari in Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 944 P.2d 657 (Colo.App.1997), to determine whether, once a named insured of an automobile liability insurance policy consents to another’s use. of the insured vehicle, the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, see §§ 10-4-701 to -726, 3 C.R.S. (1997) (“No-Fault Act” or “Act”), requires coverage for subsequent permittees.1 The court of appeals reversed the trial court’s determination that petitioner Tristan Naranjo was entitled to personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits for injuries he sustained while occupying…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Regional Transportation District v. VossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Melssen v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.