Legal Opinion
Winscom v. Garza
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1992No. 91CA1458PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TURSI.
Garnishee, Allstate Insurance Company, appeals the order of garnishment entered by the trial court against it and in favor of plaintiff, Ward C. Winscom. We reverse.
Veronica Garza borrowed her parent’s vehicle, which was insured by Allstate. Defendant Reynaldo Batalla, Veronica’s boyfriend, was forbidden from driving the car. He, nevertheless, drove the vehicle, ran a stop sign, collided with plaintiffs vehicle, and caused $33,357.57 in damages. Default judgment was entered against Ba-talla in plaintiff’s favor.
Plaintiff also asserted a claim of negligent entrustment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wiglesworth v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- McConnell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Finizio v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.