Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1998No. 97CA0615PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge HUME.

In this declaratory judgment action to determine primary liability insurance coverage, plaintiff, Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. (Metropolitan), appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Hertz Corp. (Hertz). We affirm.

Micah Bachman rented a car from Hertz. As part of the rental agreement, Bachman rejected purchasing primary liability insurance coverage from Hertz for the rented ear.

Bachman allowed Dale Rinkenberger to drive the Hertz vehicle, and Rinkenberger was involved in an accident. Rinkenberger had automotive liability coverage with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blue Cross of Western New York v. BukulmezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Bukulmez v. Hertz Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Wiglesworth v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. McConnell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API