Legal Opinion
Bukulmez v. Hertz Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1985No. 83CA0666PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■BERMAN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Shayla Bukulmez, appeals the trial court determination that intervenor, Blue Cross of Western New York and Blue Shield of Western New York (Blue Cross), is entitled to reimbursement from defendant, Hertz Corporation (Hertz), for medical expenses paid by Blue Cross on behalf of the plaintiff. Hertz cross-appeals the trial court conclusion that Hertz is responsible for payment to plaintiff of “no-fault” personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The facts are undisputed. On August 28, 1980, Hertz, a Delaware corporation qualified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Marquez v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Kennedy v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Blue Cross of Western New York v. BukulmezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Leland v. Travelers Indem. Co. of IllinoisColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- ITT Specialty Risk Services v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.