Legal Opinion

McConnell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 14, 1995No. 94SC726PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

We granted certiorari to review McConnell v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 894 P.2d 11 (Colo.App.1994), denying Carol McConnell, the plaintiff, personal injury protection benefits for injuries she sustained in an automobile accident. The court of appeals held that the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, sections 19-4-701 to -725, 4A C.R.S. (1994 & 1995 Supp.) (“No-Fault Act”), does not mandate coverage for a passenger riding in a vehicle without consent from an insured, regardless of the passenger’s good faith belief to the contrary. See McConnell, 894 P.2d at 13. We affirm the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Matits v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Norton v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. Blue Cross of Western New York v. BukulmezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lovell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Greenwood Trust Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PeifferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Wiglesworth v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API