Legal Opinion
Wiglesworth v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 28, 1996No. 95SC73PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CMef Justice VOLLACK
delivered the Opirnon of the Court.
We granted certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Wiglesworth, 903 P.2d 659 (Colo.App.1994), wMch held, inter alia, that whether the driver of a veMcle is a “permissive driver” for insurance coverage purposes depends on the factual circumstances of each case. We reverse the court of appeals and remand for reinstatement of the judgment.
I
In May of 1989, petitioner Richard L. Wiglesworth (Wiglesworth) lived at the home of Gary and Marsha Smith (the Smiths). The Smiths provided Wiglesworth…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Schuncke v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Norton v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Blue Cross of Western New York v. BukulmezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Progressive Northern Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Finizio v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Raitz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.