Legal Opinion
Housman v. Board of Medical Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1948No. Civ. 13432PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*311BRAY, J.
Subsequent to the filing of our opinion a rehearing was granted and respondents were permitted to augment the record. As an examination of the augmented record discloses that, as shown hereafter, the trial court did not err in denying the amended petition for writ of mandate, we do not deem it necessary to discuss the matters raised concerning the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend, other than as to the first alleged cause of action.
The amended petition contained two causes of action. The first alleges that on October 18, 1943, the respondent Board…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Ishimatsu v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.