Legal Opinion

Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing Board

California Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1950No. L. A. 21238PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Proceeding under section 19480.5 of the Business and Professions Code, plaintiff applied to the California Horse Racing Board for a determination that the purposes of the horse racing law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 19420 et seq.) and public interest would be served by the construction by it of a track for horse race meetings at Puente, Los Angeles County, California. The application was denied, and plaintiff thereupon presented a petition for a writ of mandate to the superior court to compel the board to issue a license to it for such purpose, and that court agreed with the board. Plaintiff now…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  5. McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API