Legal Opinion

Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1966No. S. F. 22212PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Plaintiff Wilke and Holzheiser, Inc., appeals from four separate judgments, each denying a writ of mandate seeking review of administrative decisions of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control which suspended or revoked the licenses of plaintiff’s San Francisco liquor stores. In each decision the department found that plaintiff had sold distilled spirits in violation of the mandatory retail price maintenance provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 24749-24757.)1

Plaintiff asks that we reverse these judgments on the grounds that the price maintenance…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API