Legal Opinion

Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1943No. S. F. 16609PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

— This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondents, Board of Medical Examiners and its members to cancel the order of the board revoking the petitioner’s license to practice as a drugless practitioner, and to restore or re-issue his license. The petition was filed in the superior court. An alternative writ was issued. The respondents filed an answer and the cause was set down for trial. Upon the trial judgment was entered denying the peremptory writ. The petitioner has appealed from that judgment.

*793The petitioner alleged that he was licensed as a drugless practitioner under a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Shupee v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API