Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1996No. B089504PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

Douglas and Cheryl Clark own a duplex in the City of Hermosa Beach, California (the City). In 1992, they applied to the Hermosa Beach Planning Commission for permits to demolish the duplex and replace it with a two-unit condominium. The commission approved the project. The matter was appealed to the city council (the Council). By a three-to-two vote, the Council denied the permits, finding the size of the proposed structure to be excessive.

The Clarks filed this action, seeking a writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) and alleging a violation of federal…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Sylvia Development Corporation v. Calvert CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. South Bay Chevrolet v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Las Lomas Land Company, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API