Legal Opinion
Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry
California Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1942No. L. A. 17578PublishedCited by 144 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*833CURTIS, J. —
A proceeding for a writ of mandate was instituted in the Superior Court of Fresno County to set aside an order of the California State Board of Optometry revoking appellant’s certificate of registration to practice optometry in the state of California. After a hearing the superior court rendered its judgment denying the relief sought and discharging the alternative writ of mandate and the temporary restraining order previously issued against the board. It is from this judgment that an appeal is brought to this court.
The board of optometry made an order revoking appellant’s license…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.