Legal Opinion

In Re Lavine

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1935No. S. F. 15188PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

It appears that in 1918 the petitioner was admitted to practice law in all the courts of this state. This privilege was taken from him in 1930 by his disbarment, under order of this court entered pursuant to the provisions of section 299 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon his conviction of attempted extortion, an offense involving moral turpitude, for which offense he was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for one year, which term he served, and to pay a fine of five thousand dollars. On January 16, 1934, the Governor granted petitioner a full pardon, the fine being" thereby…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API