Legal Opinion

Great Western Power Co. v. Pillsbury

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1915No. Sac. No. 2237PublishedCited by 85 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review prayed to be directed against A. J. Pillsbury, Will J. French, and Harris Weinstock, as members of and constituting the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

A writ of certiorari was issued by this court, on the application of Great Western Power Company, to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission, fixing upon said applicant a liability for the death of James May-field, one of its employees. The injury to Mayfield, and his resulting death, occurred on October 15, 1913. On that date the “Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act” (Stats. 1913, p. 279) had been approved, but it was not yet in force, the final section (92) of the act providing that it should take effect on the first day of January, 1914. And the preceding section…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Garvin v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API