Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Goodcell
California Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1939No. S. F. 16202PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an application for the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Insurance Commissioner to issue to the petitioners a permit to conduct a bail bond business in San Francisco.
The petitioners are copartners and as such had for many years conducted a bail bond business in San Francisco. In 1937 the legislature enacted the Bail Bond Regulatory Act (Stats. 1937, p. 1797), the purpose of which was to regulate the business commonly known as the bail bond business. This statute was enacted as an amendment to the Insurance Code and is incorporated in sections 1830 to 1830.42, both…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Douglas v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.