Legal Opinion
Residents of Rosemont v. Metro
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 4, 2001No. LUBA 99-009, 99-010; CA A110947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioners Rosemont Property Owners Assoc., Kuhl and Eiselius (petitioners) seek review of, and respondents City of Lake Oswego and City of West Linn (cities) cross-petition from, LUBA’s decision remanding Metro’s decision that amended its urban growth boundary (UGB) to add an 830-acre area. We affirm on the petition and reverse and remand on the cross-petition.
The parties agree that the facts are correctly stated in LUBA’s opinion:
“On March 6, 1997, Metro designated 18,579 acres of land as urban reserves pursuant to OAR chapter 660, division 21, including lands in the Stafford area of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Benjfran Development, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Baker v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Halvorson v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.