Legal Opinion
Baker v. Marion County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 12, 1993No. 92-174; CA A78828PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of Marion County’s denial of his application for an urban growth boundary (UGB) amendment, which he sought to allow enhanced developmental density on his residential subdivision and to enable him to provide access to an adjacent subdivision. We affirm.
The facts are as stated in LUBA’s opinion:
“The subject property is 10.25 acres in size and is zoned and planned [acreage-residential]. Land to the north, west and south is also zoned AR and consists of homesites and small farms. The city limits of the City of Woodburn are to the east of the subject…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Benjfran Development, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Halvorson v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Residents of Rosemont v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Milne v. City of CanbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Dep't of Land Conservation v. City of Klamath Falls & Badger Flats, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018