Legal Opinion
D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. Metro
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 12, 2000No. LUBA Nos. 97-048, 97-050, 97-052, 97-053, 97-054, 97-055, 97-057, 97-063 CA A105688PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioners and cross-petitioners seek review of LUBA’s decision remanding Metro’s designation of urban reserve areas for the Portland metropolitan region. We modify the decision and affirm it as modified.
The designation of urban reserve areas is governed by the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC) urban reserve rule, codified at OAR 660-021-0000 et seq. (the rule). The general objective of the rule is to provide for the planning of future expansions of urban growth boundaries (UGBs) through the designation of urban reserve areas that are next to existing UGBs, that are “to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Pavlicek v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Residents of Rosemont v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.