Legal Opinion
1000 Friends of Oregon v. Metro
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 30, 2001No. 2000-002; A111766PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioners - cross-respondents, Ryland Homes, Inc., and Springville Road Joint Venture (Ryland Homes) seek review of LUBA’s decision that remanded Metro’s adoption of an ordinance amending the Metro Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 109 acres of exclusive farm use (EFU) land located in northern Washington County. LUBA’s remand to Metro was based on what it held to be deficiencies in Metro’s application of factors 3 to 7, the locational factors of Goal 14. 1 Respondents - cross-petitioners, 1000 Friends of Oregon and the Washington County Farm Bureau (respondents) cross-petition, arguing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Dimone v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. City of DundeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Marks v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.