Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. Metro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 2002No. 99-007; A113961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Petitioners 1 seek judicial review of a LUBA final opinion and order affirming a Metropolitan Service District (Metro) amendment of the urban growth boundary (UGB) for the Portland metropolitan area south of the City of Hillsboro. We affirm.

The relevant facts are taken from LUBA’s order and the record below. Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. Metro, 39 Or LUBA 539 (2001). ORS 197.296 (1999) required that Metro “provide a 20-year supply of buildable residential land within the UGB.” Id. at 541. ORS 197.299 (1999) provided that Metro “must add to the UGB one-half of any additional land…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cusma v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Residents of Rosemont v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Halvorson v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Columbia Pac. Bldg. Trades Council v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API