Legal Opinion
City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 15, 2005No. 1-2003 A120189 (Control), A120957, A120979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
pro tempore
Petitioners, the City of West Linn, the City of Portland, and 1000 Friends of Oregon, seek judicial review of rules promulgated by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). Those rules allow Metro to define “subregions” within its regional urban growth boundary (UGB), allocate a regional need for land to those subregions, and amend its regional UGB if lands within or near a subre-gion are inadequate to accommodate the subregion’s need. OAR 660-026-0000 to 660-026-0040. On review, petitioners assert that LCDC’s rules are invalid because they depart from the legal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- AFSCME Local 2623 v. Department of CorrectionsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Willamette University v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stockmeier v. Nevada Department of Corrections Psychological Review PanelNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Wetherell v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Wetherell v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006