Legal Opinion

Benjfran Development, Inc. v. Metropolitan Service District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1989No. LUBA 88-039; CA A50068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of the Metropolitan Service District (Metro) denial of an amendment to its acknowledged metropolitan urban growth boundary (UGB). The amendment would have added an area of approximately 500 acres, which petitioner wished to use as the site of an “advance performance standards regional industrial park.” That project, according to petitioner, would attract industry and jobs to the region, is akin to an industrial marketing technique which is coming into use in comparable metropolitan areas and cannot be located on any existing sites within the UGB.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Lima v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Residents of Rosemont v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Baker v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Port of St. Helens v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API