Legal Opinion

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 13, 2011No. 06WKTASK001709, 08WKTASK001760; A134379PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Land Conservation and Development Commission

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

This case concerns whether the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC or commission) erred in approving a large expansion of the urban growth boundary (UGB) of the City of McMinnville (city). A UGB is the part of the land use map in a city’s comprehensive plan that demarcates the area around a city that is available for expansion and future urban uses. Here, the city proposed to expand its UGB in various directions by several hundred acres and to redesignate the included territory for different types of urban uses, including neighborhoods of integrated commercial and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barkers Five, LLC v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Columbia Pac. Bldg. Trades Council v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Zimmerman v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Dep't of Land Conservation v. City of Klamath Falls & Badger Flats, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API