Legal Opinion
Halvorson v. Lincoln County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 12, 1986No. 86-009; CA A40511PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Petitioners seek review of part of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order concerning an amendment to the urban growth boundary (UGB) of the City of Depoe Bay. ORS 197.805 et seq. The amendment incorporated the Whale Cove subdivision south of the city into the UGB. LUBA remanded the amendment to the county because of the county’s failure to address the economic, social, environmental and energy (ESEE) consequences of the change. However, LUBA rejected petitioner’s claim that the county had failed to show that the land was committed to urban development under the “locational” factors of Goal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Residents of Rosemont v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Baker v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Milne v. City of CanbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004