Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1970No. Civ. 34499PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FILES, P. J.

This is an action for damages brought by a lessor of an office building against a former lessee. After a court trial plaintiff was awarded $8,035 as the cost of restoring the premises and $2,100 for loss of rent during the three months required to complete the work. Defendant is appealing from the judgment.

In the trial court this action (superior court No. 873821) was consolidated with another action (No. 803828) brought by the same plaintiff for breach of an earlier lease. The trial court found against plainitiff on that claim, and no attack is made here on that portion of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Amen v. Merced County Title Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Martin v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Payne v. United California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Jensen v. Royal PoolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Avalon Pacific-Santa Ana, L.P. v. HD Supply Repair & Remodel, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Iverson v. Spang Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API