Legal Opinion
Iverson v. Spang Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 13, 1975No. Civ. 34782PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EMERSON, J. *
From judgment in their favor, or partially so, plaintiff Iverson and defendant-cross-complainant Spang Industries, Inc. (Spang) take this appeal. Each claims inadequacy of its respective award and each makes other contentions which we shall discuss as we reach them. Spang has denominated its appeal a cross-appeal and for the sake of clarity we shall adopt that terminology.
Iverson sued Spang for damages for breach of a lease covenant which required Spang, the lessee, upon surrender of the premises to restore the building to its original condition, normal wear and tear…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- MacDonald & Kruse, Inc. v. San Jose Steel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- ASP Properties Group, L.P. v. Fard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Polster, Inc. v. SwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.