Legal Opinion
Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1935No. L. A. 14113PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
We are in accord with the following portion of the opinion of the District Court of Appeal in the above-entitled cause and adopt the same as a part of our opinion:
“On October 1, 1924, appellant and respondent, contemporaneously executed a farming contract and a beet sale contract, the latter being expressly made a part of the former, by the terms of which appellant agreed to farm certain lands of respondent in a good and husbandlike manner and in accordance with the standards and customs in the vicinity, and plant and raise thereon a crop of beets during the 1925 season, at the expense of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Addison v. AddisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.