Klopstock v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent superior court to dismiss an action, after a general reversal of the judgment rendered at the previous trial.
The facts concerning the controversy are fully stated in a prior appeal. (Samter v. Klopstock Realty Co., 31 Cal. App. (2d) 532 [88 Pac. (2d) 250].) In 1926, Klopstock Realty Company, a corporation, had been organized, with its entire stock held by three brothers, Isaac, Frederick and Samuel Klopstock, who were also its directors. In 1933 Isaac died, leaving a will appointing his wife, Grace, and his brother, Frederick,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.