Legal Opinion

Martin v. Howe

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1922No. Sac. No. 2905PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

After decision in this action a petition for rehearing was filed in which it was claimed that the parties had not presented the question of the bar of the statute of limitations satisfactorily because the case was transferred to this court on petition of the defendants who were not involved in that question, and consequently it was believed that the matter would not be considered by this court, but that the conclusion of the district court of appeal on that branch of the case would be adopted. without question. On the contrary, the transfer of the case here by the court of its own motion or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Risley v. . Phenix Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Watkins v. NuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Nester v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1938
  5. Raps v. RapsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API