Amen v. Merced County Title Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of defendants’ demurrers to her amended complaint without leave to amend. Her first cause of action alleged that defendant Merced County Title Company breached a contract with her to act as escrow holder. Her second cause of action, based on negligence, alleged the same acts and omissions as did the first. *
The amended complaint alleges that on April 2, 1958, plaintiff and her husband entered into a written contract to purchase a tavern. The contract, in the form of escrow instructions, was typed on forms provided by…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bent v. PriestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Samuels v. MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.