Legal Opinion
Frank Pisano & Associates v. Taggart
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1972No. Civ. 28266PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs Frank Pisano & Associates and Charles W. Davidson Co. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”), seeking reversal of a judgment denying them the right to foreclose a mechanic’s hen, and by cross-complainants Abe Hyman and Mabel Hyman from a judgment denying them monetary damages on their cross-complaint.
The Facts
In 1962 Robert Taggart (hereinafter “Taggart”) was the. owner of certain real property located in San Benito County. This property was subject to a deed of trust in favor of Abe Hyman and Mabel Hyman securing a loan…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Donohoe Construction Co. v. Mount Vernon AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.