Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Royal Pools

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1975No. Civ. 44401PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Plaintiffs Harold and Wanda Jensen appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants Royal Pools and Rolling Hills Vista Town House Co., after the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrers to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint and dismissed the action.

Facts

In February 1969, Rolling Hills Town Club No. (“Club”) the original plaintiff in this action, 1 filed a complaint on theories of negligence and breach of contract against defendants, alleging that plaintiff Club “is an unincorporated association consisting of the owners of all the condominiums in the project known as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Smeltzley v. Nicholson Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bartalo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Del Mar Beach Club Owners Ass'n v. Imperial Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Shelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API