Legal Opinion
Armco, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 29, 1990No. Court 88-05-00381PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUSGRAVE, Judge.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs in this action are United States manufacturers of carbon steel wire rod. The defendant-intervenor Amalgamated Steel Mills, Berhad (“A.S.M.”) is a Malaysian company that manufacturers carbon steel wire rod and has at times exported this product to the United States. At the time of the investigation in this case it was the only Malaysian producer of steel wire rod. The plaintiffs filed a countervailing duty petition with the Department of Commerce (“Department”) on September 3, 1987 in which they asserted that Malaysian companies exporting carbon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Daido Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Roses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.