Legal Opinion
Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 13, 1994No. Consolidated Court No. 93-07-00428PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1107Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, United States manufacturers of fer-rosilicon, move for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2, contesting certain parts of the final determination of the Department of Commerce in Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Ferrosilicon From Venezuela, 58 Fed. Reg. 27,522 (Dep’t Comm. 1993). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2) (1988) and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1988)
Background
In response to plaintiffs’ petition, Commerce initiated an antidump-ing investigation of ferrosilicon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allied-Signal Aerospace Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- American Alloys, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Hyundai Elecs. Indus. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001