Legal Opinion

Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 2, 1987No. Appeal 86-1441PublishedCited by 302 opinions

1Per curiam

Cerámica Regiomontana, S.A., and In-dustrias Intercontinental, S.A., appeal the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 636 F.Supp. 961 (1986) (Re, C.J.), which affirmed the final results of an administrative review by the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration (ITA) of a countervailing duty order for ceramic tile from Mexico. 49 Fed.Reg. 9,919 (1984). We affirm.

Cerámica and Industrias contend that the methodology used by the ITA to calculate the countervailing duty rates was improper as a matter of law and was not supported by substantial evidence.

Appella…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986

3Cited by302 opinions

  1. William Cronin v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Timken U.S. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

297 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API