PPG Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Acting Chief Judge:
Plaintiff PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”) moved pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court for partial judgment upon the agency record. Defendant-Intervenors Vitro Flex, S.A. and Cristales Inastillables, S.A. filed a cross-claim against the United States pursuant to Rule 13(f), seeking judgment upon the agency record in support of their cross-claim. These challenges contest several aspects of the final determination of the International Trade Administration, United States Department of Commerce (“ITA” or “Commerce”), in Fabricated…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cabot Corporation v. The United States, Hules Mexicanos, S.A. And Negromex, S.A., Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Floral Trade Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- AL Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.