Legal Opinion
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 26, 1951No. 40PublishedCited by 8,247 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
The essential issue raised by this case and its companion, Labor Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co., post, p. 498, is the effect of the Administrative Procedure Act and the legislation colloquially known as the Taft-Hartley Act on the duty of Courts of Appeals when called upon to review orders of the National Labor Relations Board.
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted enforcement of an order directing, in the main, that petitioner reinstate with back pay an employee found to have been discharged because he gave testimony under the Wagner Act and cease and desist from…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8,247 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
8,242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.