Legal Opinion
Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 13, 1994No. Consolidated Court No. 93-06-00322PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1118Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, ChiefJudge:
Plaintiffs, domestic manufacturers of ferrosili-con, move for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2, contesting certain parts of the final affirmative determination of the United States Department of Commerce. Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Ferrosilicon From Venezuela; and Countervailing Duty Order for Certain Ferrosilicon From Venezuela, 58 Fed. Reg. 27,539, amended by 58 Fed. Reg. 36,394 (Dep’t Comm. 1993). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2) (1988) and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allied-Signal Aerospace Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. United States, Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Armco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. And American Alloys, Inc. v. The United States, and Cvg-Venezolana De Ferrosilicio, C.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Geneva Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- AIMCOR, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Aimcor v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.