Legal Opinion
Roses, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 3, 1990No. Court 84-5-00632PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiffs move for judgment on the administrative record of Certain Fresh Cut Flowers From Mexico, 49 Fed.Reg. 15007 (1984) (Final Determination). The International Trade Administration (ITA or Commerce) conducted this investigation under section 303 et seq. of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1303 et seq. (1982), and determined that “no benefits that constitute bounties or grants within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), are being provided to producers or exporters in Mexico of fresh cut flowers, ...”…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cabot Corporation v. The United States, Hules Mexicanos, S.A. And Negromex, S.A., Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Zenith Radio Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Cabot Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Alberta Pork Producers' Marketing Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Roses Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. United States, Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. United States, Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991