Legal Opinion
Pagett v. Hawaiian Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1975No. Civ. 44099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALLPORT, J.
Petitioners appeal from the denial of their amended petition for order compelling arbitration under section 1281.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (a); Esparza v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 257 Cal.App.2d 496, 498, fn. 1 [65 Cal.Rptr. 245].)
Contention
It is contended by petitioners that, because the petition alleges the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy, that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate and there is no finding that the right to compel arbitration has been waived or that grounds exist for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- O'MALLEY v. Wilshire Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Travelers Insurance v. BouzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Baker v. Italian Maple Holdings, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Wiemann v. Industrial Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Melchor Investment Co. v. Rolm SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.