Legal Opinion

O'MALLEY v. Wilshire Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1963No. L. A. 26771PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

While the parties to a collective bargaining agreement may delineate the scope of an arbitration provision according to their design, neither the language of the provision in the instant ease, nor the facts, support the contention that the arbitration procedure excluded the arbitrability of the present grievance of the union. We hold, for the reasons that follow, that the trial court, by accepting the posited contentions of the defendant, improperly resolved the merits of the dispute. Instead of narrowly and exclusively determining the question of arbitrability, the court invaded the province…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Morris v. ZuckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API