Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior Court

FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. *

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate, or in the alternative, prohibition, directing respondent court (1) to vacate and set aside an order made November 27, 1964, and set out below, (2) to accept jurisdiction of the causes of action set forth in plaintiff’s complaint, and (3) to determine in said action those matters therein presented which are not the subject of arbitration; or in the alternative that respondent court be restrained (1) from enforcing said order of November 27, 1964, (2) from refusing to accept jurisdiction of those matters presented in petitioner’s suit…