Legal Opinion

Baker v. Italian Maple Holdings, LLC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 31, 2017No. D069797PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAaron, J.

*1154I.

INTRODUCTION

Marlene Baker LaBerge, a 73-year-old woman, was a resident and patient of a 24-hour skilled nursing facility owned by Italian Maple Holdings, LLC dba La Paloma Healthcare Center (La Paloma). Approximately a week after LaBerge arrived at the facility, La Paloma's staff presented LaBerge with two arbitration agreements that included language required by Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1295, subdivision (c). Section 1295, subdivision (c) requires such agreements to include a 30-day "cooling off" period, during which the parties to the agreement may rescind it. Ten days after…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Summit Health, Ltd. v. PinhasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Ruiz v. PodolskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cox v. Bonni, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Caballero v. Premier Care Simi ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Cox v. BonniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Dominguez v. Stone Brewing Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Kostandian v. American Honda Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API