Legal Opinion
Wiemann v. Industrial Underwriters Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1986No. B013474PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Jntroduction
Petitioner Robert Christopher Wiemann (Wiemann), claiming uninsured motorist coverage, appeals from the order of the superior court (Hon. Peter S. Smith, judge) denying his petition to compel respondent Industrial Un derwriters Insurance Company (Industrial Underwriters) to enter into binding arbitration pursuant to Insurance Code section 11580.2. We affirm.
Facts
The facts are not in dispute. Petitioner Wiemann alleges that he was injured while driving a motor vehicle owned by James Nelson in a collision with another vehicle driven by Robert Otto Schulze,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Olympic Insurance v. Employers Surplus Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- O'SULLIVAN v. Salvation ArmyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pagett v. Hawaiian InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- General Star Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- General Star Nat. Ins. Corp. v. World Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1997
- CAL. PAC. HOMES, INC. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Furlough v. Transamerica Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Komorsky v. Farmers Ins. Exch., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.