Legal Opinion
Melchor Investment Co. v. Rolm Systems
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1992No. H008476PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
1. Introduction
Plaintiff Melchor Investment Company (lessor) purports to appeal from the denial of its request to preliminarily enjoin arbitration jointly requested by defendant Rolm Systems (sublessee) and defendant International Business Machines Corporation (sublessor). Lessor claims it is not required to submit to an arbitration demand by sublessee because the lease’s arbitration provision is inapplicable and they have no other arbitration agreement. For the reasons stated below, we will dismiss this matter as nonappealable.
2. Facts
On April 14, 1976, lessor entered into two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Palmer v. Ted Stevens Honda, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- International Film Investors v. Arbitration Tribunal of Directors GuildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- American Builder's Assn. v. Au-YangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. HardinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Szetela v. Discover BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Southeast Resource Recovery Facility Authority City of Long Beach v. Montenay International Corporation Montenay Pacific Power Corporation, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellants v. Dravo Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Southeast Resource Recovery Facility Authority v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Porter v. United Services Automobile Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Bre DDR BR Whittwood Ca LLC v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.