Legal Opinion

Orpustan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1972No. S.F. 22930PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant following the granting of its motion for summary judgment in an action to compel arbitration under the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy issued to plaintiff by defendant.

The uninsured motorist coverage in the policy conforms to the requirements of Insurance Code section 11580.2. It provides, in statutory terms, that the insurer shall pay all sums which the insured shall become legally entitled to recover as damages for bodily injury from the owner or operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. An…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. YeagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Patton v. La BreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Felner v. Meritplan Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Esparza v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mercury Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Izzi v. Mesquite Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Davis v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sheldon B. Fernandez, and Marlene J. MiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API