Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Bouzer
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1974No. Civ. 13849PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PIERCE, J. *
In this declaratory relief action following summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers), defendant Maurice Bouzer appeals.
The terms of Bouzer’s policy of automobile liability insurance with Travelers included, as the law of the State of California requires, “uninsured motorist” coverage. The policy states that the insurer agrees “To pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury sustained by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Katz v. American Motorist InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Firemen's Insurance v. DiskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Security National Insurance v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Cossitt v. Federated Guar. Mut. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Rudd v. California Casualty General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Davis v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Gorton v. Reliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.