Legal Opinion

Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1910No. Civ. No. 739PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County, and from an order denying a new trial. John G-. Covert, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action for damages for the death of a minor son of plaintiff, alleged to have been caused through the negligence of the defendant, a corporation.

The cause was tried by jury. The plaintiff, in her complaint, claimed! damages in the sum of $10,000. The jury, however, returned a verdict for the sum of $5,000, for which amount the court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff.

This appeal is from the judgment so entered and from the order denying defendant a new trial.

The general points made by appellant are that the evidence does not support the verdict; that the court erred, to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fox v. Oakland Consolidated Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. HaydonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Marks v. ReissingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Ross v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. McClaugherty v. Rogue River Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API