Legal Opinion

People v. Haydon

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1912No. Crim. No. 167PublishedCited by 56 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Trinity County, and from an order denying a new trial. James W. Bartlett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There are, generally speaking, but two points upon which reliance is based for a reversal of the judgment and order, from which the defendant, convicted of murder of the second degree, prosecutes the appeal to this court, viz.: 1. That the evidence does not justify and support the verdict; 2. That the court committed a series of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. McCreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. People V. EstradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People v. HowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Troutman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  3. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. DupreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API